Celeron 2.80 vs J1750

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and Celeron 2.80 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Northwood (2001−2004)
Release date	1 September 2013 (10 years ago)	November 2003 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$72	no data
Current price	$200 (2.8x MSRP)	$70

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and Celeron 2.80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Base clock speed	2.41 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.41 GHz	2.8 GHz
L1 cache	112 KB	8 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	128 KB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 KB
Chip lithography	22 nm	130 nm
Die size	no data	146 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	55 million
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and Celeron 2.80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	478
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and Celeron 2.80. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
SIPP	-	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	-	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and Celeron 2.80 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Identity Protection	-	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and Celeron 2.80 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and Celeron 2.80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR1, DDR2
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
ECC memory support	-	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series	no data
Graphics max frequency	750 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and Celeron 2.80 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and Celeron 2.80.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	4	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	22 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	73 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and Celeron 2.80, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---