Processor N200 vs Celeron G6900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G6900
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 46 Watt
2.87
+84%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56

Celeron G6900 outperforms Processor N200 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G6900 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16622107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency5.9024.61
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

Celeron G6900 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.4 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G6900 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G6900 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Celeron G6900 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G6900 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G6900 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 710Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G6900 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G6900 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G6900 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G6900 and Processor N200.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes209

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.87 1.56
Integrated graphics card 2.85 3.28
Recency 4 January 2022 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron G6900 has a 84% higher aggregate performance score.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has 15.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 666.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G6900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G6900 is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G6900 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G6900
Celeron G6900
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 163 votes

Rate Celeron G6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 145 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G6900 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.