A4-6320 vs Celeron G5900T
Aggregate performance score
Celeron G5900T outperforms A4-6320 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G5900T and A4-6320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2137 | 2383 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.99 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | no data | Richland (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 1 April 2020 (4 years ago) | December 2013 (10 years ago) |
| Current price | $539 | $201 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron G5900T and A4-6320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96K |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,303 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G5900T and A4-6320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G5900T and A4-6320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| PowerNow | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G5900T and A4-6320 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G5900T and A4-6320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1600 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon HD 8370D |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G5900T and A4-6320.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Celeron G5900T outperforms A4-6320 by 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Celeron G5900T outperforms A4-6320 by 41% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.39 | 0.99 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron G5900T has a 40.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
The Celeron G5900T is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6320 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G5900T and A4-6320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
