Apple M2 Pro vs Celeron G555

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G555
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.90

Apple M2 Pro outperforms Celeron G555 by a whopping 1464% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G555 and Apple M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2519527
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G555 and Apple M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)3.3 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)36 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G555 and Apple M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G555 and Apple M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron G555 and Apple M2 Pro technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G555 and Apple M2 Pro are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G555 and Apple M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G555 and Apple M2 Pro integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G555 and Apple M2 Pro.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G555 0.90
Apple M2 Pro 14.08
+1464%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G555 1388
Apple M2 Pro 21712
+1464%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.90 14.08
Recency 1 September 2012 17 January 2023
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm

Apple M2 Pro has a 1464.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M2 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G555 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G555 is a desktop processor while Apple M2 Pro is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G555 and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G555
Celeron G555
Apple M2 Pro
M2 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 10 votes

Rate Celeron G555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 164 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G555 or Apple M2 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.