Atom Z3735G vs Celeron G540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G540
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.76
+52%

Celeron G540 outperforms Atom Z3735G by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G540 and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26312857
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date4 September 2011 (13 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$158$17

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G540 and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size131 mm2112 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G540 and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155UTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G540 and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron G540 and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G540 and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G540 and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB1 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s5.3 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequency1 GHz646 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G540 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G540 and Atom Z3735G.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G540 0.76
+52%
Atom Z3735G 0.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G540 1172
+51.8%
Atom Z3735G 772

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 0.50
Recency 4 September 2011 9 April 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 2 Watt

Celeron G540 has a 52% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom Z3735G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 3150% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G540 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3735G in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G540 is a desktop processor while Atom Z3735G is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G540 and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G540
Celeron G540
Intel Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 105 votes

Rate Celeron G540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 59 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G540 or Atom Z3735G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.