Atom D425 vs Celeron G470

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G470
2013
1 core / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.36
+177%
Atom D425
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.13

Celeron G470 outperforms Atom D425 by a whopping 177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G470 and Atom D425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30363333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.971.23
Architecture codenameno dataPineview (2009−2011)
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$993

Detailed specifications

Celeron G470 and Atom D425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speedno data1.83 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G470 and Atom D425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G470 and Atom D425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G470 and Atom D425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G470 and Atom D425 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G470 and Atom D425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel GMA 3150
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G470 and Atom D425 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G470 and Atom D425.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G470 0.36
+177%
Atom D425 0.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G470 570
+179%
Atom D425 204

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 0.13
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.01
Recency 1 April 2013 21 June 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron G470 has a 176.9% higher aggregate performance score, 7600% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D425, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D425 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G470 is a desktop processor while Atom D425 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G470 and Atom D425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G470
Celeron G470
Intel Atom D425
Atom D425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 14 votes

Rate Celeron G470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 63 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G470 or Atom D425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.