Celeron E3400 vs G3930

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3930
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.45
+164%

G3930 outperforms E3400 by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3930 and Celeron E3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20882717
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.913.72
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)17 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$76
Current price$131 (3.1x MSRP)$18.99 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron E3400 has 309% better value for money than Celeron G3930.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3930 and Celeron E3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus support8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3930 and Celeron E3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron E3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron G3930 and Celeron E3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron E3400 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron E3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3930 and Celeron E3400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron E3400 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron E3400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron E3400.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3930 1.45
+164%
Celeron E3400 0.55

G3930 outperforms E3400 by 164% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G3930 2237
+162%
Celeron E3400 854

G3930 outperforms E3400 by 162% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G3930 606
+111%
Celeron E3400 287

G3930 outperforms E3400 by 111% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G3930 1040
+117%
Celeron E3400 480

G3930 outperforms E3400 by 117% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 0.55
Recency 3 January 2017 17 January 2010
Cost $42 $76
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 65 Watt

The Celeron G3930 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3930 and Celeron E3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3930
Celeron G3930
Intel Celeron E3400
Celeron E3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 216 votes

Rate Celeron G3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 249 votes

Rate Celeron E3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3930 or Celeron E3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.