Celeron G1830 vs G3920

Place in the ranking	2164	2485
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.17	1.23
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	2.75	1.72
Architecture codename	Skylake (2015−2016)	Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date	1 September 2015 (9 years ago)	1 December 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$52	$85

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G1830 has 624% better value for money than Celeron G3920.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3920 and Celeron G1830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2.9 GHz	2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.9 GHz	2.8 GHz
Bus type	DMI 3.0	no data
Bus rate	4 × 8 GT/s	5 GT/s
Multiplier	29	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	4 MB (shared)	2 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Die size	150 mm²	177 mm²
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	65 °C	72 °C
Number of transistors	1,400 million	1,400 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3920 and Celeron G1830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	FCLGA1151	FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt	53 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3920 and Celeron G1830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+

Security technologies

Celeron G3920 and Celeron G1830 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	-
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	+
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	no data
OS Guard	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3920 and Celeron G1830 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	-
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3920 and Celeron G1830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3, DDR4	DDR3
Maximum memory size	64 GB	32 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	34.134 GB/s	21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics 510	Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors
Max video memory	64 GB	1.7 GB
Quick Sync Video	+	+
Clear Video	+	no data
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	950 MHz	1.05 GHz
InTru 3D	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3920 and Celeron G1830 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	3
eDP	+	+
DisplayPort	+	+
HDMI	+	+
DVI	+	+
VGA	no data	+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3920 and Celeron G1830 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	+	no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	4096x2304@24Hz	1920x1080@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP	4096x2304@60Hz	2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort	4096x2304@60Hz	2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over VGA	N/A	1920x1200@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3920 and Celeron G1830 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	12	11.1/12
OpenGL	4.4	4.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3920 and Celeron G1830.

PCIe version	3.0	Up to 3.0
PCI Express lanes	16	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3920 1.48
+51%

Celeron G1830 0.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3920 2358
+51.2%

Celeron G1830 1560

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.48	0.98
Integrated graphics card	1.61	0.77
Recency	1 September 2015	1 December 2013
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt	53 Watt

Celeron G3920 has a 51% higher aggregate performance score, 109.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 3.9% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G3920 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1830 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3920 and Celeron G1830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.