Xeon w3-2535 vs Celeron G3900TE
Aggregate performance score
Xeon w3-2535 outperforms Celeron G3900TE by a whopping 1842% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2510 | 270 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.35 | 82.26 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.15 | 11.58 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 19 October 2015 (9 years ago) | 24 August 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $42 | $739 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon w3-2535 has 5993% better value for money than Celeron G3900TE.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron G3900TE and Xeon w3-2535 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 10 |
| Threads | 2 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 23 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 26.25 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 98.57 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G3900TE and Xeon w3-2535 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 185 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900TE and Xeon w3-2535. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron G3900TE and Xeon w3-2535 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900TE and Xeon w3-2535 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900TE and Xeon w3-2535. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR5-4400 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 2 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 510 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900TE and Xeon w3-2535.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.15 | 22.33 |
| Recency | 19 October 2015 | 24 August 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 10 |
| Threads | 2 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 185 Watt |
Celeron G3900TE has 428.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon w3-2535, on the other hand, has a 1841.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads.
The Intel Xeon w3-2535 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G3900TE in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron G3900TE is a notebook processor while Xeon w3-2535 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
