Xeon E-2456 vs Celeron G3900TE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900TE
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.20
Xeon E-2456
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
15.08
+1157%

Xeon E-2456 outperforms Celeron G3900TE by a whopping 1157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900TE and Xeon E-2456 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2255434
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.35no data
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Raptor Lake-S
Release date19 October 2015 (8 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42no data
Current price$42 (1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900TE and Xeon E-2456 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size98.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900TE and Xeon E-2456 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketLGA-1151FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900TE and Xeon E-2456. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron G3900TE and Xeon E-2456 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900TE and Xeon E-2456 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900TE and Xeon E-2456. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900TE and Xeon E-2456.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900TE 1.20
Xeon E-2456 15.08
+1157%

Xeon E-2456 outperforms Celeron G3900TE by 1157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G3900TE 1850
Xeon E-2456 23330
+1161%

Xeon E-2456 outperforms Celeron G3900TE by 1161% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 15.08
Recency 19 October 2015 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

The Xeon E-2456 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900TE in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron G3900TE is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2456 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900TE and Xeon E-2456, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE
Intel Xeon E-2456
Xeon E-2456

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2456 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900TE or Xeon E-2456, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.