Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U vs Celeron G3900TE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900TE
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.20
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
12.49
+941%

Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U outperforms Celeron G3900TE by a whopping 941% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900TE and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2255576
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.358.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Hawk Point
Release date19 October 2015 (8 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42no data
Current price$42 (1x MSRP)$1119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U has 512% better value for money than Celeron G3900TE.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900TE and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size98.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm137 mm2
Number of transistorsno data20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900TE and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketLGA-1151FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900TE and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900TE and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900TE and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510AMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900TE and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1614

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900TE 1.20
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U 12.49
+941%

Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U outperforms Celeron G3900TE by 941% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G3900TE 1850
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U 19316
+944%

Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U outperforms Celeron G3900TE by 944% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 12.49
Integrated graphics card 1.36 9.00
Recency 19 October 2015 16 April 2024
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

The Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900TE in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron G3900TE is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900TE and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900TE or Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.