Xeon E3-1205 v6 vs Celeron G3900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.35
Xeon E3-1205 v6
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
3.58
+165%

Xeon E3-1205 v6 outperforms Celeron G3900 by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22391509
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.184.64
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Xeon E3
Power efficiency2.515.21
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)28 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1205 v6 has 2478% better value for money than Celeron G3900.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier2830
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size150 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.55V-1.52V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900 and Xeon E3-1205 v6. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++

Security technologies

Celeron G3900 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME
OS Guard-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900 and Xeon E3-1205 v6. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510Intel HD Graphics P630
Max video memory64 GB1.7 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency950 MHz1 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3900 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3900 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2160@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/AN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3900 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900 and Xeon E3-1205 v6.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900 1.35
Xeon E3-1205 v6 3.58
+165%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3900 2151
Xeon E3-1205 v6 5682
+164%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 3.58
Integrated graphics card 1.61 3.11
Recency 1 September 2015 28 March 2017
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron G3900 has 27.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon E3-1205 v6, on the other hand, has a 165.2% higher aggregate performance score, 93.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Xeon E3-1205 v6 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G3900 is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1205 v6 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900 and Xeon E3-1205 v6, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900
Intel Xeon E3-1205 v6
Xeon E3-1205 v6

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 223 votes

Rate Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1205 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900 or Xeon E3-1205 v6, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.