Celeron G540 vs G3900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron G3900
2015
2 cores / 2 threads
1.41
+85.5%
Celeron G540
2011
2 cores / 2 threads
0.76

G3900 outperforms G540 by 86% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Celeron G3900 and Celeron G540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20912523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.180.02
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)4 September 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$158
Current price$105 (2.5x MSRP)$19.25 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3900 has 800% better value for money than Celeron G540.

Detailed Specifications

Celeron G3900 and Celeron G540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size150 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data69 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900 and Celeron G540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900 and Celeron G540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron G3900 and Celeron G540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX-no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900 and Celeron G540 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900 and Celeron G540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency950 MHz1 GHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3900 and Celeron G540 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3900 and Celeron G540 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3900 and Celeron G540 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900 and Celeron G540.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900 1.41
+85.5%
Celeron G540 0.76

G3900 outperforms G540 by 86% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G3900 2180
+86%
Celeron G540 1172

G3900 outperforms G540 by 86% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G3900 582
+46.6%
Celeron G540 397

G3900 outperforms G540 by 47% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G3900 995
+45.7%
Celeron G540 683

G3900 outperforms G540 by 46% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.41 0.76
Recency 1 September 2015 4 September 2011
Cost $42 $158
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 65 Watt

The Celeron G3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G540 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900 and Celeron G540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900
Intel Celeron G540
Celeron G540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 190 votes

Rate Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 100 votes

Rate Celeron G540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900 or Celeron G540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.