Atom Z2580 vs Celeron G3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.22
+430%

Celeron G3900 outperforms Atom Z2580 by a whopping 430% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24843393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.013.24
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Clovertrail (2013)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)27 February 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900 and Atom Z2580 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size98.57 mm265 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900 and Atom Z2580 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FC-MB4760
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900 and Atom Z2580. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
PAEno data32 Bit
Smart Idleno data+

Security technologies

Celeron G3900 and Atom Z2580 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900 and Atom Z2580 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900 and Atom Z2580. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR2
Maximum memory size64 GB2 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s8.5 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510PowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz)
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency950 MHz533 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3900 and Atom Z2580 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3900 and Atom Z2580 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3900 and Atom Z2580 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900 and Atom Z2580.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data
USB revisionno data2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0
Number of USB portsno data2
UARTno data3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 0.23
Recency 19 October 2015 27 February 2013
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 3 Watt

Celeron G3900 has a 430.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z2580, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 1600% lower power consumption.

The Intel Celeron G3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z2580 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G3900 is a desktop processor while Atom Z2580 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900
Intel Atom Z2580
Atom Z2580

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 233 votes

Rate Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 6 votes

Rate Atom Z2580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron G3900 and Atom Z2580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.