Celeron N4000 vs G1830

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1830
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
0.98
+5.4%
Celeron N4000
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.93

Celeron G1830 outperforms Celeron N4000 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1830 and Celeron N4000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24852529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.23no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.7114.59
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release date1 December 2013 (11 years ago)11 December 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1830 and Celeron N4000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache2 MB4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 deg C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1830 and Celeron N4000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron N4000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Celeron G1830 and Celeron N4000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron N4000 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron N4000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memory1.7 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1830 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
VGA+no data
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/1212
OpenGL4.34.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron N4000.

PCIe versionUp to 3.02.0
PCI Express lanes166
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1830 0.98
+5.4%
Celeron N4000 0.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1830 1560
+6%
Celeron N4000 1472

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.98 0.93
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.87
Recency 1 December 2013 11 December 2017
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron G1830 has a 5.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N4000, on the other hand, has 13% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 783.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron G1830 and Celeron N4000.

Note that Celeron G1830 is a desktop processor while Celeron N4000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1830 and Celeron N4000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1830
Celeron G1830
Intel Celeron N4000
Celeron N4000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 10 votes

Rate Celeron G1830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 937 votes

Rate Celeron N4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1830 or Celeron N4000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.