Xeon X7560 vs Celeron G1620

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1620
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
0.99
Xeon X7560
2010
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
5.11
+416%

Xeon X7560 outperforms Celeron G1620 by a whopping 416% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1620 and Xeon X7560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24791216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.703.72
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)no data
Release date3 December 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$208no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1620 and Xeon X7560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.27 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.67 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)24 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1620 and Xeon X7560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1567,FCLGA1567
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1620 and Xeon X7560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron G1620 and Xeon X7560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1620 and Xeon X7560 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1620 and Xeon X7560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1620 and Xeon X7560 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1620 and Xeon X7560.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1620 0.99
Xeon X7560 5.11
+416%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1620 1571
Xeon X7560 8110
+416%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 5.11
Recency 3 December 2012 1 January 2010
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 130 Watt

Celeron G1620 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 136.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon X7560, on the other hand, has a 416.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Xeon X7560 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1620 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1620 is a desktop processor while Xeon X7560 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1620 and Xeon X7560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1620
Celeron G1620
Intel Xeon X7560
Xeon X7560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 84 votes

Rate Celeron G1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 13 votes

Rate Xeon X7560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1620 or Xeon X7560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.