Pentium N3540 vs Celeron G1610

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1610
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
0.98
+25.6%

Celeron G1610 outperforms Pentium N3540 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1610 and Pentium N3540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24632612
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date3 December 2012 (11 years ago)22 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$388$251

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1610 and Pentium N3540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.66 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1610 and Pentium N3540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1610 and Pentium N3540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Connectno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron G1610 and Pentium N3540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key-+
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1610 and Pentium N3540 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1610 and Pentium N3540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1333
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s21.32 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz896 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1610 and Pentium N3540 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1610 and Pentium N3540 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1610 and Pentium N3540.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1610 0.98
+25.6%
Pentium N3540 0.78

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1610 1518
+26.4%
Pentium N3540 1201

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G1610 412
+115%
Pentium N3540 192

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G1610 689
+25.3%
Pentium N3540 550

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.98 0.78
Recency 3 December 2012 22 May 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron G1610 has a 25.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Pentium N3540, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 685.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G1610 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3540 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1610 is a desktop processor while Pentium N3540 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1610 and Pentium N3540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1610
Celeron G1610
Intel Pentium N3540
Pentium N3540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 226 votes

Rate Celeron G1610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 483 votes

Rate Pentium N3540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1610 or Pentium N3540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.