Xeon w5-2465X vs Celeron E3400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.57
Xeon w5-2465X
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
30.65
+5277%

Xeon w5-2465X outperforms Celeron E3400 by a whopping 5277% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3400 and Xeon w5-2465X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2827144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.7263.19
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.8013.97
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date17 January 2010 (14 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$76$1,389

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w5-2465X has 1599% better value for money than Celeron E3400.

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3400 and Xeon w5-2465X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB33.75 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3400 and Xeon w5-2465X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3400 and Xeon w5-2465X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron E3400 and Xeon w5-2465X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3400 and Xeon w5-2465X are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3400 and Xeon w5-2465X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3400 and Xeon w5-2465X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E3400 0.57
Xeon w5-2465X 30.65
+5277%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E3400 869
Xeon w5-2465X 46906
+5298%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron E3400 290
Xeon w5-2465X 2163
+646%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron E3400 485
Xeon w5-2465X 14541
+2898%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 30.65
Recency 17 January 2010 15 February 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

Celeron E3400 has 207.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon w5-2465X, on the other hand, has a 5277.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Xeon w5-2465X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3400 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E3400 is a desktop processor while Xeon w5-2465X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3400 and Xeon w5-2465X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3400
Celeron E3400
Intel Xeon w5-2465X
Xeon w5-2465X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 268 votes

Rate Celeron E3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate Xeon w5-2465X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3400 or Xeon w5-2465X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.