Atom N550 vs Celeron G1610

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1610 and Atom N550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2509	3266
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.03	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Atom
Power efficiency	1.65	1.89
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date	3 December 2012 (12 years ago)	23 August 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$388	$86

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1610 and Atom N550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	4
Base clock speed	2.6 GHz	1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.6 GHz	1.5 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	666 MHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	22 nm	45 nm
Die size	94 mm2	87 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	65 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	176 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1610 and Atom N550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1155	FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1610 and Atom N550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AVX	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Demand Based Switching	no data	-

Security technologies

Celeron G1610 and Atom N550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	-
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	-	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1610 and Atom N550 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	-
VT-x	+	-
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1610 and Atom N550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	32 GB	2 GB
Max memory channels	2	1
Maximum memory bandwidth	21 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors	Intel GMA 3150
Graphics max frequency	1.05 GHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1610 and Atom N550 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

3

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1610 and Atom N550.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.96	0.18
Integrated graphics card	0.77	0.01
Recency	3 December 2012	23 August 2010
Threads	2	4
Chip lithography	22 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	8 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1610 and Atom N550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---