Itanium 9350 vs FX-8350

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8350 and Itanium 9350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1477not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.84no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD FX-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency2.83no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)no data
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8350 and Itanium 9350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed4 GHz1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz1.87 GHz
L2 cache8192 KBno data
L3 cacheno data24 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8350 and Itanium 9350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+FCLGA1248
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and Itanium 9350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data50 Bit

Security technologies

FX-8350 and Itanium 9350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and Itanium 9350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and Itanium 9350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and Itanium 9350.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 1 January 2010
Physical cores 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 185 Watt

FX-8350 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 48% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-8350 and Itanium 9350. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8350 is a desktop processor while Itanium 9350 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8350 and Itanium 9350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8350
FX-8350
Intel Itanium 9350
Itanium 9350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3699 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Itanium 9350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8350 or Itanium 9350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.