Celeron 847 vs G1101

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1101
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.68
+127%
Celeron 847
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.30

Celeron G1101 outperforms Celeron 847 by a whopping 127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1101 and Celeron 847 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27193098
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.97no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency0.88no data
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)19 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85$134

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1101 and Celeron 847 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz1.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors382 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1101 and Celeron 847 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1156FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1101 and Celeron 847. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching--
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI++
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Celeron G1101 and Celeron 847 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1101 and Celeron 847 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1101 and Celeron 847. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16.38 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1101 and Celeron 847 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1101 and Celeron 847.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes116

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1101 0.68
+127%
Celeron 847 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1101 1086
+127%
Celeron 847 478

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 0.30
Recency 7 January 2010 19 June 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron G1101 has a 126.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 847, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 329.4% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G1101 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 847 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1101 is a desktop processor while Celeron 847 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1101 and Celeron 847, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101
Intel Celeron 847
Celeron 847

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 384 votes

Rate Celeron 847 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1101 or Celeron 847, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.