Atom Z3740 vs Celeron G1101

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1101
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.68
+74.4%
Atom Z3740
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.39

Celeron G1101 outperforms Atom Z3740 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27193005
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.97no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.8818.45
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85$32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz1.86 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16.38 GB4 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s17.1 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1101 0.68
+74.4%
Atom Z3740 0.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1101 1086
+74.9%
Atom Z3740 621

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 0.39
Recency 7 January 2010 27 September 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 2 Watt

Celeron G1101 has a 74.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom Z3740, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 3550% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G1101 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3740 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1101 is a desktop processor while Atom Z3740 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101
Intel Atom Z3740
Atom Z3740

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 41 vote

Rate Atom Z3740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1101 or Atom Z3740, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.