Atom Z3740 vs Celeron G1101
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2714 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.97 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.89 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Clarkdale (2010−2011) | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 27 September 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $85 | $32 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.27 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1156 | UTFCBGA1380 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| vPro | - | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| FDI | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 16.38 GB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17 GB/s | 17.1 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 667 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 1 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 January 2010 | 27 September 2013 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 2 Watt |
Atom Z3740 has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 3550% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron G1101 is a desktop processor while Atom Z3740 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1101 and Atom Z3740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
