Atom x3-3205RK vs Celeron E3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3400 and Atom x3-3205RK processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2798not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.72no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Silvermont (2015)
Release date17 January 2010 (14 years ago)2 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$76no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3400 and Atom x3-3205RK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)2 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3400 and Atom x3-3205RK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3400 and Atom x3-3205RK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron E3400 and Atom x3-3205RK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3400 and Atom x3-3205RK are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3400 and Atom x3-3205RK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR2, DDR3 1333 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataMali-450 MP4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3400 and Atom x3-3205RK.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 January 2010 2 March 2015
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 2 Watt

Atom x3-3205RK has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 3150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E3400 and Atom x3-3205RK. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron E3400 is a desktop processor while Atom x3-3205RK is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3400 and Atom x3-3205RK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3400
Celeron E3400
Intel Atom x3-3205RK
Atom x3-3205RK

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 267 votes

Rate Celeron E3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom x3-3205RK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3400 or Atom x3-3205RK, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.