Xeon Gold 5412U vs Celeron E3300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E3300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.51
Xeon Gold 5412U
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
33.80
+6527%

Xeon Gold 5412U outperforms Celeron E3300 by a whopping 6527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 5412U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2755100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.83no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Sapphire Rapids
Release dateAugust 2009 (14 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data
Current price$46 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 5412U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB45 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 5412U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 5412U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 5412U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 5412U are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 5412U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 5412U.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E3300 0.51
Xeon Gold 5412U 33.80
+6527%

Xeon Gold 5412U outperforms Celeron E3300 by 6527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron E3300 795
Xeon Gold 5412U 52742
+6534%

Xeon Gold 5412U outperforms Celeron E3300 by 6534% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 33.80
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 185 Watt

The Xeon Gold 5412U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3300 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E3300 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5412U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 5412U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3300
Celeron E3300
Intel Xeon Gold 5412U
Xeon Gold 5412U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 166 votes

Rate Celeron E3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5412U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3300 or Xeon Gold 5412U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.