Celeron E1600 vs E3300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E3300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.50
Celeron E1600
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.53
+6%

Celeron E1600 outperforms Celeron E3300 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3300 and Celeron E1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28922868
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.83no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.730.77
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Allendale (2006−2009)
Release date30 August 2009 (15 years ago)31 May 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3300 and Celeron E1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)512 KB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size82 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C73 °C
Number of transistors228 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3300 and Celeron E1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3300 and Celeron E1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron E3300 and Celeron E1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3300 and Celeron E1600 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3300 and Celeron E1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3300 and Celeron E1600.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E3300 0.50
Celeron E1600 0.53
+6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E3300 795
Celeron E1600 840
+5.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 0.53
Recency 30 August 2009 31 May 2009
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Celeron E3300 has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron E1600, on the other hand, has a 6% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron E3300 and Celeron E1600.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3300 and Celeron E1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3300
Celeron E3300
Intel Celeron E1600
Celeron E1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 178 votes

Rate Celeron E3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Celeron E1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3300 or Celeron E1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.