Xeon 5130 vs Celeron E3200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E3200
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.55
+5.8%

Celeron E3200 outperforms Xeon 5130 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3200 and Xeon 5130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28482872
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.880.74
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.770.73
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Woodcrest (2006)
Release date30 August 2009 (15 years ago)June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52$16

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron E3200 has 289% better value for money than Xeon 5130.

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3200 and Xeon 5130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)0 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C65 °C
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625VB2=1V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3200 and Xeon 5130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775771
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3200 and Xeon 5130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Celeron E3200 and Xeon 5130 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3200 and Xeon 5130 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3200 and Xeon 5130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3200 and Xeon 5130.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E3200 0.55
+5.8%
Xeon 5130 0.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E3200 839
+5.5%
Xeon 5130 795

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 0.52
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Celeron E3200 has a 5.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron E3200 and Xeon 5130.

Note that Celeron E3200 is a desktop processor while Xeon 5130 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3200 and Xeon 5130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3200
Celeron E3200
Intel Xeon 5130
Xeon 5130

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 75 votes

Rate Celeron E3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate Xeon 5130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3200 or Xeon 5130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.