Processor N100 vs Celeron E1600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E1600
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.54
Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
2.39
+343%

Processor N100 outperforms Celeron E1600 by a whopping 343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1600 and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28491785
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency0.7737.00
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date31 May 2009 (15 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$128

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1600 and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.4 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm10 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C105 °C
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1600 and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1600 and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1600 and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1600 and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1600 and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1600 and Processor N100.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 2.39
Recency 31 May 2009 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N100 has a 342.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E1600 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E1600 is a desktop processor while Processor N100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1600 and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1600
Celeron E1600
Intel Processor N100
Processor N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate Celeron E1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1218 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1600 or Processor N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.