EPYC 9475F vs Celeron E1600

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1600 and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2849not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.77no data
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Turin (2024)
Release date31 May 2009 (15 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,592

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1600 and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die size77 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1600 and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1600 and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron E1600 and EPYC 9475F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1600 and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1600 and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1600 and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2009 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 400 Watt

Celeron E1600 has 515.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E1600 and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron E1600 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1600 and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1600
Celeron E1600
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate Celeron E1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1600 or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.