Pentium 4 HT 3.00 vs Celeron E1500

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1500 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release dateNovember 2008 (16 years ago)April 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1500 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)8 KB
L2 cache512 KB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die size77 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors105 million55 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1500 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775478
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt82 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1500 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1500 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1500 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1500 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 82 Watt

Celeron E1500 has 100% more physical cores, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 26.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E1500 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1500 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1500
Celeron E1500
Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.00
Pentium 4 HT 3.00

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 48 votes

Rate Celeron E1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 49 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 3.00 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1500 or Pentium 4 HT 3.00, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.