EPYC 9655P vs Celeron Dual-Core T3300

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Turin (2024)
Release date1 February 2010 (14 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,811

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data12x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket P 478SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and EPYC 9655P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2010 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 400 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 has 1042.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and EPYC 9655P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 35 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3300 or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.