EPYC 9555 vs Pentium Dual T4200
Primary details
Comparing Pentium Dual Core T4200 and EPYC 9555 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2679 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | Intel Pentium Dual Core | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.95 | no data |
Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Turin (2024) |
Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (recently) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $9,826 |
Detailed specifications
Pentium Dual Core T4200 and EPYC 9555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 128 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 256 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 8x 70.6 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 410 million | 66,520 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Dual Core T4200 and EPYC 9555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Socket | P | SP5 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 360 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T4200 and EPYC 9555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
AMT | + | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Pentium Dual Core T4200 and EPYC 9555 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T4200 and EPYC 9555 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T4200 and EPYC 9555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Dual Core T4200 and EPYC 9555.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2009 | 10 October 2024 |
Physical cores | 2 | 64 |
Threads | 2 | 128 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 360 Watt |
Pentium Dual T4200 has 928.6% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9555, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual Core T4200 and EPYC 9555. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Pentium Dual Core T4200 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9555 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T4200 and EPYC 9555, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.