i9-12900F vs Celeron Dual-Core T3100

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T3100
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.77
Core i9-12900F
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
23.81
+2992%

Core i9-12900F outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3100 by a whopping 2992% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Core i9-12900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2659222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Power efficiency2.0133.40
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Core i9-12900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size107 mm2215 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Core i9-12900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479, PGA478FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Core i9-12900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Core i9-12900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Core i9-12900F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Core i9-12900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Core i9-12900F.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 0.77
i9-12900F 23.81
+2992%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 1174
i9-12900F 36440
+3004%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 23.81
Recency 1 September 2009 4 January 2022
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 24
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i9-12900F, on the other hand, has a 2992.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

The Core i9-12900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T3100 is a notebook processor while Core i9-12900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Core i9-12900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
Celeron Dual-Core T3100
Intel Core i9-12900F
Core i9-12900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 33 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 141 vote

Rate Core i9-12900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3100 or Core i9-12900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.