A4-1350 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T3100
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.76
+31%

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 outperforms A4-1350 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and A4-1350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25552711
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD A-Series
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2009 (14 years ago)18 October 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price$32 $156

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and A4-1350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz1 GHz
Bus support800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors410 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and A4-1350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479, PGA478FT3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and A4-1350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3-1066
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and A4-1350 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and A4-1350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8210

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 0.76
+31%
A4-1350 0.58

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 outperforms A4-1350 by 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 1174
+31.3%
A4-1350 894

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 outperforms A4-1350 by 31% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 0.58
Recency 1 September 2009 18 October 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 8 Watt

The Celeron Dual-Core T3100 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-1350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and A4-1350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
Celeron Dual-Core T3100
AMD A4-1350
A4-1350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 32 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate A4-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3100 or A4-1350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.