Pentium M 770 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium M 770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CorePentium M
Architecture codenamePenryn-1M (2009)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)January 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium M 770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speedno data2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.13 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache64 KB32 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm284 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors410 Million140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V-1.372V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium M 770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketP (478)PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium M 770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium M 770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium M 770 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 1593
+115%
Pentium M 770 740

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 27 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 770, on the other hand, has 29.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium M 770. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium M 770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Intel Pentium M 770
Pentium M 770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 60 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 11 votes

Rate Pentium M 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3000 or Pentium M 770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.