Pentium 4 HT 3.20 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium 4 HT 3.20 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Architecture codenamePenryn-1M (2009)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)June 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium 4 HT 3.20 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB8 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size107 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors410 Million55 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium 4 HT 3.20 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketP (478)478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt82 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium 4 HT 3.20. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 82 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 has 100% more physical cores, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 134.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium 4 HT 3.20. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 HT 3.20 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Pentium 4 HT 3.20, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.20
Pentium 4 HT 3.20

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 61 vote

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 20 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 3.20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3000 or Pentium 4 HT 3.20, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.