Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Dual-Core T3000

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T3000
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.39
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.39

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30693062
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency1.061.06
Architecture codenamePenryn-1M (2009)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)1 February 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketP (478)Socket P 478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 0.39
Celeron Dual-Core T3300 0.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 630
Celeron Dual-Core T3300 633
+0.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2009 1 February 2010

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 has an age advantage of 9 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Celeron Dual-Core T3300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 61 vote

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 52 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.