Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreApple M-Series
Architecture codenamePenryn-1M (2009)no data
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads210
Base clock speedno data2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB7.3 MB
L2 cache1 MB36 MB
L3 cacheno data24 MB
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketP (478)no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt2424 ‑ 3696 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 687
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 21754
+3067%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2009 17 January 2023
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 10
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2424 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 has 6825.7% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
M2 Pro 10-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 61 vote

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 110 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro 10-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3000 or Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.