AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-56 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
General info
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating | 1179 | 1210 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Trinidad / Tyler (2007) |
Release date | 1 May 2008 (14 years old) | 4 May 2007 (15 years old) |
Current price | no data | $245 |
Technical specs
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Bus support | 533 MHz | 800 MHz |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90/65 nm |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | no data | S1 |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 33/31 Watt |
Benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-56 by 4% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-56 by 4% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 4.69 | 4.49 |
Recency | 1 May 2008 | 4 May 2007 |
Boost clock speed | 1866 | 1800 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 33 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Celeron Dual-Core T1500 from AMD is Ryzen 3 3350U, which is faster by 1% and higher by 8 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Celeron Dual-Core T1500:
Competitors of Turion 64 X2 TL-56 by Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Turion 64 X2 TL-56 by Intel is Core i5-7440HQ, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to Turion 64 X2 TL-56:
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.