Turion 64 X2 TL-56 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Aggregate performance score
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-56 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3193 | 3206 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 0.44 | 0.46 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Trinidad / Tyler (2007) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (17 years ago) | 4 May 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90/65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 33/31 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.40 | 0.39 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 4 May 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 33 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 has a 2.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 X2 TL-56, on the other hand, has 6.1% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-56.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
