Opteron 4334 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 4334 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by a whopping 474% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3251 | 2026 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.53 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2M (2008) | Seoul (2012) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (17 years ago) | 4 December 2012 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Opteron 4334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 288 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 6144 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Opteron 4334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | P | C32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Opteron 4334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Opteron 4334 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Opteron 4334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.39 | 2.24 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 4 December 2012 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 95 Watt |
Opteron 4334 has a 474.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 438.9% lower power consumption.
The AMD Opteron 4334 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is a notebook processor while Opteron 4334 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
