EPYC 9175F vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and EPYC 9175F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3111not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Power efficiency2.84no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Turin (2024)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134$4,256

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size107 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million133,040 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketBGA956SP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and EPYC 9175F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 320 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has 3100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9175F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and EPYC 9175F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9175F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and EPYC 9175F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
AMD EPYC 9175F
EPYC 9175F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9175F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 or EPYC 9175F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.