3015e vs Pentium M 765

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 765
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.22
3015e
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.69
+668%

3015e outperforms Pentium M 765 by a whopping 668% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 765 and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31952065
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency0.9926.66
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date20 October 2004 (20 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 765 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KB192 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.988-1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 765 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FT5
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 765 and 3015e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 765 and 3015e are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 1.69
Recency 20 October 2004 4 August 2020
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 6 Watt

3015e has a 668.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The 3015e is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 765 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 765 and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 30 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 765 or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.