E2-3000 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
2009, $134
2 cores / 2 threads, 1 Watt
0.26

E2-3000 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34073212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD E-Series
Power efficiencyno data3.00
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)23 May 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and E2-3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.65 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors410 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and E2-3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956FT3
Power consumption (TDP)1 MB15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and E2-3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and E2-3000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and E2-3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8280
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and E2-3000.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 0.26
E2-3000 0.42
+61.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 458
Samples: 70
E2-3000 743
+62.2%
Samples: 18

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.42
Recency 1 September 2009 23 May 2013
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has 1400% lower power consumption.

E2-3000, on the other hand, has a 61.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD E2-3000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
AMD E2-3000
E2-3000

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 9 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and E2-3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.