Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | 2x Athlon 64 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Hawk-256 |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (14 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | no data |
| Current price | no data | $14.07 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus support | 800 MHz | 667 MHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA956 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by 16% in Passmark.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by 19% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 31 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
