Pentium SU4100 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-53

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.35
+9.4%
Pentium SU4100
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.32

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 outperforms Pentium SU4100 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Pentium SU4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30593100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x Athlon 64no data
Power efficiency1.073.03
Architecture codenameHawk-256Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateno data1 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Pentium SU4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Pentium SU4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataBGA956
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Pentium SU4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Pentium SU4100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Pentium SU4100 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Pentium SU4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 0.35
+9.4%
Pentium SU4100 0.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 558
+11.4%
Pentium SU4100 501

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 167
+1.2%
Pentium SU4100 165

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 307
+5.5%
Pentium SU4100 291

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.32
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 10 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 has a 9.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Pentium SU4100, on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 210% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Pentium SU4100.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Pentium SU4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Intel Pentium SU4100
Pentium SU4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 9 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 13 votes

Rate Pentium SU4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 or Pentium SU4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.