EPYC 9654 vs Celeron D 326

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 326 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated4
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.12
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Genoa
Release dateSeptember 2004 (19 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current price$35 $4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 326 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)96
Threads1192
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache16 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size109 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors125 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 326 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketPLGA478,PLGA775SP5
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 326 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron D 326 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 326 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 326 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron D 326 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 96
Threads 1 192
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 360 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 326 and EPYC 9654. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron D 326 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 326 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 326
Celeron D 326
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 76 votes

Rate Celeron D 326 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 982 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 326 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.