Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Celeron B840

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B840
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.61
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
14.11
+2213%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms Celeron B840 by a whopping 2213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B840 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2801521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency1.6547.66
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date1 July 2011 (13 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B840 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s54 MHz
Multiplier19no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B840 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketG2 (988B)FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B840 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron B840 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B840 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B840 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 950 MHz)AMD Radeon 880M

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B840 0.61
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 14.11
+2213%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B840 967
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22406
+2217%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 14.11
Integrated graphics card 0.34 20.07
Recency 1 July 2011 1 October 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron B840 has -87.5% more threads.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 2213.1% higher aggregate performance score, 5802.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 13 years, 300% more physical cores, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B840 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B840 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B840
Celeron B840
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 17 votes

Rate Celeron B840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B840 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.