A6-3420M vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
21.38
+2415%

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms A6-3420M by a whopping 2415% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and A6-3420M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2652584
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)AMD A-Series
Power efficiency36.102.21
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)20 December 2011 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and A6-3420M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB0 KB
Chip lithography4 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and A6-3420M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP8FS1
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and A6-3420M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and A6-3420M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and A6-3420M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 890MAMD Radeon HD 6520G

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 21.38
+2415%
A6-3420M 0.85

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 32724
+2429%
A6-3420M 1294

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.38 0.85
Integrated graphics card 21.66 0.77
Recency 25 July 2024 20 December 2011
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 2415.3% higher aggregate performance score, 2713% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 12 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

A6-3420M, on the other hand, has 54.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3420M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and A6-3420M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
AMD A6-3420M
A6-3420M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 196 votes

Rate A6-3420M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or A6-3420M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.