Ryzen 7 3800XT vs Celeron B830

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B830
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.55
Ryzen 7 3800XT
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
15.14
+2653%

Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Celeron B830 by a whopping 2653% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B830 and Ryzen 7 3800XT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2833473
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.81
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency1.4613.39
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)16 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B830 and Ryzen 7 3800XT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache128 KB512 KB
L2 cache512 KB4 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size131 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors504 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B830 and Ryzen 7 3800XT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B830 and Ryzen 7 3800XT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron B830 and Ryzen 7 3800XT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B830 and Ryzen 7 3800XT are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B830 and Ryzen 7 3800XT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B830 and Ryzen 7 3800XT integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B830 and Ryzen 7 3800XT.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B830 0.55
Ryzen 7 3800XT 15.14
+2653%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B830 857
Ryzen 7 3800XT 23603
+2654%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron B830 257
Ryzen 7 3800XT 1771
+589%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron B830 447
Ryzen 7 3800XT 8543
+1811%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 15.14
Recency 1 September 2012 16 June 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 105 Watt

Celeron B830 has 200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 3800XT, on the other hand, has a 2652.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 3800XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B830 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron B830 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 3800XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B830 and Ryzen 7 3800XT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B830
Celeron B830
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
Ryzen 7 3800XT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 89 votes

Rate Celeron B830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 306 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3800XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B830 or Ryzen 7 3800XT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.