Ryzen 3 3100 vs Celeron B830

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B830
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.55
Ryzen 3 3100
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
7.65
+1291%

Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Celeron B830 by a whopping 1291% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B830 and Ryzen 3 3100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2833962
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.70
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronMatisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)
Power efficiency1.4610.93
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)24 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B830 and Ryzen 3 3100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size131 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors504 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B830 and Ryzen 3 3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B830 and Ryzen 3 3100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron B830 and Ryzen 3 3100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B830 and Ryzen 3 3100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B830 and Ryzen 3 3100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B830 and Ryzen 3 3100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B830 and Ryzen 3 3100.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B830 0.55
Ryzen 3 3100 7.65
+1291%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B830 857
Ryzen 3 3100 11928
+1292%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron B830 257
Ryzen 3 3100 1498
+483%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron B830 447
Ryzen 3 3100 5127
+1047%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 7.65
Recency 1 September 2012 24 April 2020
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron B830 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 3100, on the other hand, has a 1290.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 3100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B830 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron B830 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 3100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B830 and Ryzen 3 3100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B830
Celeron B830
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 89 votes

Rate Celeron B830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1701 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B830 or Ryzen 3 3100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.