Atom x5-Z8300 vs Celeron B830

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron B830
2012
2 cores / 2 threads
0.54
+3.8%
Atom x5-Z8300
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
0.52

Celeron B830 outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Celeron B830 and Atom x5-Z8300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26992720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron5x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Cherry Trail (2016)
Release date1 September 2012 (11 years ago)2 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data
Current price$26 (0.3x MSRP)$197

Technical specs

Celeron B830 and Atom x5-Z8300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.84 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B830 and Atom x5-Z8300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988UTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B830 and Atom x5-Z8300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron B830 and Atom x5-Z8300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B830 and Atom x5-Z8300 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B830 and Atom x5-Z8300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB2 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s12.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics
Max video memoryno data2 GB
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B830 and Atom x5-Z8300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron B830 and Atom x5-Z8300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B830 and Atom x5-Z8300.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes161
USB revisionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B830 0.54
+3.8%
Atom x5-Z8300 0.52

Celeron B830 outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron B830 846
+3.9%
Atom x5-Z8300 814

Celeron B830 outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by 4% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron B830 268
+103%
Atom x5-Z8300 132

Celeron B830 outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by 103% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron B830 468
+28.9%
Atom x5-Z8300 363

Celeron B830 outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by 29% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.54 0.52
Recency 1 September 2012 2 March 2015
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

We couldn't decide between Celeron B830 and Atom x5-Z8300. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B830 and Atom x5-Z8300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B830
Celeron B830
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
Atom x5-Z8300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 79 votes

Rate Celeron B830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 45 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B830 or Atom x5-Z8300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.